samplewebsite.com
Report date: September 6, 2025
Summary
WebGrade reviewed 127 pages on samplewebsite.com. The site is running on WordPress, and the overall organization is strong: most pages connect in a logical way, and the sitemap is in place, though it’s missing a few pages. Based on all categories combined, the site earns a B grade overall. That means the site is solid but has a few weak spots holding it back.
SEO and Findability
The site has basic SEO in place. Titles and descriptions are filled in on most pages, and the site shows up on Google. Mobile use is supported. However, not all content is tagged properly for search, and structured data (schema) is incomplete. This area scores a B, meaning it’s in good shape but could rank better with some technical tweaks.
Site Structure and Logic
The site is well-organized. Navigation is simple, menus make sense, and most content is easy to find. There are no major dead ends or confusing paths. WebGrade gives this section an A, meaning the site’s “blueprint” is working well.
Usability and User Experience
Visitors will likely find the site easy to use. Text is readable, menus are clear, and the design works well on both desktop and mobile. However, it sometimes takes 4+ clicks to reach popular content, which slows people down. Still, the site earns an A here.
Content Quality
The writing is uneven. Some pages are clear and persuasive, but others are wordy, repetitive, or vague. Calls to action aren’t always strong or obvious. Grammar issues show up in several blog posts. Because of this, the site earns a C for content quality.
Performance and Load Speed
The site loads, but not quickly enough to keep all visitors engaged. Some images are too large, and a few broken links slow down the experience. On average, pages load in 4.2 seconds, which is above the recommended 3 seconds. This section scores a C.
Accessibility
The site is difficult to use for visitors with disabilities. Many images are missing descriptions, color contrast is low on key buttons, and some menus can’t be easily used with a keyboard. The accessibility score is a D, which is a major gap.
Legal Compliance
The basics are covered: there is a privacy statement and terms of service. However, the cookie notice is unclear and does not meet all GDPR requirements. This section earns a B.
Recommendations
Content Quality: Revise blog posts for clarity, shorten long passages, standardize tone of voice, strengthen CTAs, and fix grammar issues.
Performance: Compress 38 large images, remove or replace 12 broken links, reduce average load time to under 3s.
Accessibility: Add alt text to all images, correct ARIA roles, fix color contrast (buttons, links), and retest with screen reader and keyboard navigation.
Legal: Update cookie banner to “opt-in” compliance; consider adding an accessibility statement.
Ongoing: Monitor SEO schema and indexing, ensure sitemap stays current, and revisit content quarterly.